M.A.D.N.E.S.S. · Metamodern Alchemy

MERC

Model of Emergent Relational Complexity · Germane Marvel

⌕ Click any perspective to expand its full explication

What is MERC
A meta-framework for all stage theories — hierarchical but not teleological, additive not negating

Perspective matters because living systems do not observe the world in the same way. Sylvia Wynter identifies storytelling as uniquely human — naming us Homo Narrans. Our cultures are narratively created, and these narratives drive our behaviour as much as our genes. They add a second layer — a cultural fitness landscape — on top of the biological one. Wynter borrows the term sociogeny from Frantz Fanon for this concept.

This is why mainstream metamodernism has gone astray — it has no robust metamodern theory of culture, only a theory of metamodern culture specific to a western lineage of development. The answer lies in recognising that human cultures are not biological, not linear, not necessarily teleological. They are self-initiating, engaging in auto-poiesis.

"Maybe the perspectives at the heart of relational contexts have a structure that doesn't depend on negation."

— Germane Marvel, M.A.D.N.E.S.S.

Nora Bateson famously stated "Stage theory is colonial BS." Hanzi Freinacht defended developmental hierarchies. Both were partly right — what was missing was a nested meta-framework that could be both non-linear and genuinely non-moralising. MERC is that framework.

We are born experiencing ourselves purely as subjects. From an early age we learn to turn the subject into an object to form relationships. At some point we learn to see objects as part of interrelated systems. And further still, we come to understand that all systems have an inner dimension — that everything is also a subject. Each perspective depends on the previous but does not negate it. Earlier perspectives remain always available.

Hierarchical
Each perspective depends on and builds from the previous one — there is genuine developmental structure.
Non-linear
Later perspectives do not erase earlier ones. All remain available. Context chooses the lens.
Additive
Each development integrates what came before rather than cancelling it out. No negation. Only expansion.
Non-teleological
There is no final destination. MERC does not implicitly moralise later perspectives as better — only more complex.
Read the full essay on Substack ↗
The Model
11 Relational Perspectives (0–10)

Each perspective is identified by its position (N.), its name, and the relationship it describes. The number indicates foundational depth. Click any perspective to read its full explication.

MERC is additive, not substitutive. You do not outgrow earlier perspectives — they become integrated tools. Just as understanding the mind as a system of conscious and subconscious parts does not stop you from identifying as a unified subject, each new relational capacity expands without erasing. We can hold Subjective awareness (0) while thinking Systemically (5). MERC provides a description of the many perspectives we can take, showing also how those perspectives are context-dependent. Humans are able to relate using multiple perspectives simultaneously.